Re: Murder Most Fowl! (Score: 2, Insightful)
posted Monday, December 23, 2002 - 07:23 PM (
#3348)
In Response to zamphir (#3347):
Ultimately the responsibility for the decision to commit suicide lies with Fish, and it might be a stretch to say Diablo (or anyone else) "killed" him based on the information we have. But, that doesn't mean that Diablo's innocent in all this.
To say "suicide is a selfish act" only points to motivation. Fish comitted suicide because he chose death as an alternative to his perception of what continued life would be like (and not, for example, because he felt that Diablo, Reese, Ryan, Toothgnip, or the Pope wanted him dead). But what shaped said perception of continued life? Even selfishness doesn't overcome the interconnectedness of things.
In a human mind, I'd go on to say that there must have been more chronic issues which would have been brought to the surface by something else if not this. Fish's mind seemed much simpler than the average human's, though, so I'm not entirely convinced of that.
Even if Diablo's actions hadn't led to Fish's demise, though, they still would've been Evil[tm]. We may not have 1st degree murder here, but I'd say we have a good case for involuntary fishslaughter.
Gregor Mendel... hmm, possibly a deeper plot at work. Maybe Mendel set out to frame Diablo in order to separate him from the trust of his friends, or even to get him out of the way entirely. Retribution for the DNA extraction incident, or a plan to make sure such interference doesn't occur again...
--
Constants might be the only universal irony