our sponsor

Thirteen Panels of Doom (10 comments)

Thirteen Panels of Doom

Monday, September 29, 2003 - 10:08 AM

Comixpedia is running a dealie where aspiring cartoonists and bored college students can take a whack at completing a scary, thirteen-panel story using a panel drawn by one of several webcartoonists as a starting point (I am one of those artists).

If you make the best story from the initial inspiration, you'll win the original artwork from that starting panel you've been provided with. For details, check out http://www.frightnight.org.

javaman83
javaman83

Initiate

From: deep in the forests of Fayette-Nam

Posts: 10

Registered:
Sep 2000
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 1)
posted Monday, September 29, 2003 - 01:54 PM (#9138)
so according to this site Jon is known as darth baio.
i always knew there was something more inherently evil about him.
i think that is why i like him.
--


It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.
-Douglas Adams
Locked profile www
mookypootpoot
Initiate

From: THE DEPTHS OF HELL!!!

Posts: 18

Registered:
Sep 2003
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 1)
posted Monday, September 29, 2003 - 03:55 PM (#9145)
yeah. darth baio! he's scott baio in disguise...is this a bizarre, sinister plot?
--
glory is fleeting, obscurity is forecer --napolean bonaparte
Locked profile
Rich
Rich

Code Monk

From: Druggachusetts

Posts: 784

Registered:
Sep 2000
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 2, Informative)
posted Tuesday, September 30, 2003 - 12:07 PM (#9176)
Check the archives [goats.com] for the truth about Darth Baio.
--
If I had any dignity that would be humiliating. - Adam Savage, Mythbusters
Locked profile
deerboy
deerboy

Code Monk

From: The place where no Truthsayer can see.

Posts: 1730

Registered:
Jan 2001
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 2, Informative)
posted Wednesday, October 01, 2003 - 12:14 PM (#9224)
In Response to mookypootpoot (#9145):

obscurity is forecer

so are typos

 
--
A clever mix of 'deer' and 'boy' [continentalmills.com]
Locked profile
kornz
kornz

Code Monk

From: Back to California

Posts: 482

Registered:
Sep 2003
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 1)
posted Thursday, October 02, 2003 - 08:38 PM (#9301)
In Response to deerboy (#9224):

this whole rating system confuses me,
as does the difference between poking fun at someone for a typo and ridiculing them for being an atrocious speller.
--
It's better to destroy than create what's unnecessary.
Locked profile www
Dynedain
Dynedain

Code Monk

From: anywhere but here

Posts: 1384

Registered:
Jul 2002
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 2)
posted Thursday, October 02, 2003 - 08:51 PM (#9305)
In Response to kornz (#9301):

people here are pedants

people here like to poke at other people in inflamatory ways

your reaction was fairly atypical, and I did not get reaction that anyone was ridiculing you except when you were making illogical unfounded arguments

nothing personal of course
--
But do you ever see a person leave a cathedral toting a to-go box?

Coffins don't count.
Locked profile www
zamphir
zamphir

Code Monk

Posts: 5047

Registered:
Sep 2000
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 2)
posted Thursday, October 02, 2003 - 09:00 PM (#9307)
In Response to kornz (#9301):

I don't exactly accept that I was "ridiculing" you for being an atrocious speller.

Angrily pointing out your mistakes, yes. But being angry at someone isn't the same as making fun of them.

And the spelling errors are only the smallest little bit of the things you have done wrong - according to the generally held conventions here. Typos happen to everyone.

But again, you posted a lot of unimaginative, inane comments in threads that had been dead for at least a month, disrupting the reading habits of everyone.

Then you start whining that we're making fun of you because you're disabled - BEFORE YOU'VE TOLD US YOU'RE DISABLED.

None of these things make me think happy thoughts towards you.

The rating system is relatively clear. People give you points when they like what you've said for whatever reason. They take points away when they don't like the things you've said.

But only some people can give or take away points, and those people are chosen randomly and can only give or take away a very small set of points at a time.

--
Ain't nobody here but us turkeys [youtube.com]
Locked profile
mea37
Code Monk

Posts: 580

Registered:
Jul 2002
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 2)
posted Friday, October 03, 2003 - 12:23 AM (#9313)
In Response to kornz (#9301):

this whole rating system confuses me,

Slashdot-style moderation. Users who fit a certain profile become moderators at random times. They then get five points, each of which is used to raise or lower a posts's score one notch. When a moderator changes the score of your post, he or she changes your karma; positive karma has several effects, including being a factor in moderation. It's karmic like that.

There are some rules about which posts a given moderator can moderate. Regular, productive posters are usually eligible to meta-moderate, which keeps moderators in check by rating their actions as "fair" or "unfair" (anonymously and randomly).

Thus, post count is of little value (unless you're in the zamphir fan club), while post quality (posting things that others see as contributions to the conversation) is of great value.

I seem to recall I was supposed to throw together a FAQ, which would of course include all this. I appologize to Jon for my delinquency; frankly I'd forgotten about it. I shall yet see what I can do.

as does the difference between poking fun at someone for a typo and ridiculing them for being an atrocious speller.

Perhaps you're particularly sensitive about this one point, but as Z points out, it is hardly the focus of what you've gotten ripped for here. For what it's worth, since the fighting began, your posting habits appear to have improved. Now if you just get the chip off your shoulder you should be fine.

Everyone mis-speels, and everyone gets ribbed for it. Nobody's singling you out over that. We've been singling you out because in other ways you made yourself a target. Typos are just a quick, easy way to hit someone. Others have gotten lit up for it a lot worse than you.

Like it or not, the spelling cracks are part of the collective sense of humor (or something like that). We haven't changed our ways for other thin skins, so I don't see why we'd start with yours.

It's frustrating when you spend a lot of effort overcoming a problem to have people picking at the little things that get past you. That fact can be socially limiting if you let it. Hence, as I've said before, part of coping is being secure enough in your efforts that normal, every-day picking doesn't piss you off.
--
Constants might be the only universal irony
Locked profile
kornz
kornz

Code Monk

From: Back to California

Posts: 482

Registered:
Sep 2003
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 1)
posted Friday, October 03, 2003 - 02:15 AM (#9323)
In Response to mea37 (#9313):

yes, it is frustrating, as frustrating as I am drunk
--
It's better to destroy than create what's unnecessary.
Locked profile www
Oedipa_Maas
Code Monk

From: Not Mali

Posts: 409

Registered:
Aug 2002
Re: Thirteen Panels of Doom (Score: 2)
posted Friday, October 03, 2003 - 01:27 PM (#9338)
In Response to mea37 (#9313):

I seem to recall I was supposed to throw together a FAQ, which would of course include all this. I appologize to Jon for my delinquency; frankly I'd forgotten about it. I shall yet see what I can do.

You've written a couple [goats.com] of informative [goats.com]and detailed posts about this subject in the last week. You could copy and paste bits of those into a document and you'd almost be done.
--
Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it.
Locked profile www
Discussion: Thirteen Panels of Doom | Login/Create an Account | 10 comments
Threshold:  Locked
The Fine Print: The above comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Hell, let's face it, we're not responsible for anything; including the things we say, do, or think. And if you sue us because you think we are? Well, we're not responsible for that either.
6