posted Tuesday, March 25, 2003 - 05:10 PM (#4701)
So, CNN has this article today:
gaming for fun and profit [cnn.com].
My initial reaction is "Oh man are these guys gonna get burned when their servers prove to be insecure.".
But the more I think about it, the more I think it's a good trend. People should be able to make a living off of playing video games. I mean, why not? Isaac Misrahi earns more money in a year than he should in a lifetime, so why not give the same opportunity to some twitchy-fingered gaming geek?
It's still pathetic to bet on video games, though. I think. I mean, if someone were able to make lots of money playing video games, then more power to them.
But what do you think? Is it always going to be pathetic for someone to play Duke Nukem or Unreal Tournament for money? Is Tiger Woods equally pathetic, or does the type of game matter?
Is it pathetic if someone makes $10 a year, but not if they make $1,000,000?
gaming for fun and profit [cnn.com].
My initial reaction is "Oh man are these guys gonna get burned when their servers prove to be insecure.".
But the more I think about it, the more I think it's a good trend. People should be able to make a living off of playing video games. I mean, why not? Isaac Misrahi earns more money in a year than he should in a lifetime, so why not give the same opportunity to some twitchy-fingered gaming geek?
It's still pathetic to bet on video games, though. I think. I mean, if someone were able to make lots of money playing video games, then more power to them.
But what do you think? Is it always going to be pathetic for someone to play Duke Nukem or Unreal Tournament for money? Is Tiger Woods equally pathetic, or does the type of game matter?
Is it pathetic if someone makes $10 a year, but not if they make $1,000,000?
--
Ain't nobody here but us turkeys [youtube.com]
Ain't nobody here but us turkeys [youtube.com]



